Culture Sluts











Noel Gallagher with union flag guitarWhat was Britpop?

What was Britpop? In musical terms, Britpop was guitar pop music, with its roots in the independent music scene established during the eighties. The relative amounts of rock and pop varied with each band. At the pop end of the spectrum were Pulp, an eighties pop band who added a few more guitars for their Different Class album; and Blur, a shoegazing band who adopted a smarter, Mod-influenced sound for their Modern Life Is Rubbish album. At the rock end of the spectrum were Oasis, whose influences included early seventies glam and late seventies punk; and Manic Street Preachers, who transformed their American rock sound into something more melodic and British sounding for Everything Must Go.

In cultural terms, Britpop was something more interesting- a danse macabre between class and national identity. Along with race/ethnicity, these are the factors which help define us as individuals and shape the way we respond to the rest of the world. Most of the political and ideological battles of the twentieth century can be understood as conflicts over the relative importance of these factors. Socialists emphasise class, fascists emphasise race; between these extremes, mainstream politicians often implicitly or explicitly use national identity to rally support. It’s a much more inclusive identity than the other two and therefore much more effective. A voter in a British election may be black or white, rich or poor, but they will almost certainly have been born in Britain and therefore be British, even though they may not always feel particularly conscious or proud of that fact.

Select magazine

Class and Nationality

Class fault lines run through British society in the same way that race divisions are fundamental to American society. In Britain, the class divide also manifests itself as a geographical divide between the richer, media-centred South and the poorer, industrial and post-industrial North. Actually, the divide isn’t strictly north-south; economic deprivation corresponds roughly to the distance you are away from London, and so the divide is really a diagonal line running from Gloucester to just south of Grimsby. This, incidentally, puts Wales as well as Scotland in the ‘North’ of the country.

British indie was forged in class division. British punk had much more class rage than American punk, being the preserve of the London underclass rather than Greenwich Village bohemians; consequently, the post-punk and indie scenes which emerged in Britain during the eighties were also predominantly working class. As British indie broke into the mainstream during the early nineties Manchester, the ‘capital of the North’, became the cultural centre of the UK, and the bands which emerged were proud of their working class roots and often emphasised them through their music.

All this was welcome. What was not so welcome was indie’s increasing tendency to wave the flag, a tendency which would lead to the genre being re-labelled ‘Britpop’. Much of this change was driven by the music press, who were at the height of their influence; it was kick-started by a Select magazine cover featuring Suede’s Brett Anderson superimposed over the Union flag and the headline ‘Yanks Go Home!’ in April 1993. Suede, Pulp, Blur and the other emerging indie bands were given the dubious honour of being ambassadors for the nation, valiantly repelling the hordes of American grunge bands which lapped at our shores. In retrospect it all seems very silly, and some of the principle actors recognise it as such. Brett Anderson himself insists “I never wanted to be photographed in front of a flag.”

Blur

So how did the class consciousness of British indie feed into the flag waving nationalism of Britpop? The answer lies is the increasingly globalised nature of modern life. As transport and communication becomes easier as a result of increasingly affordable technology the cultural barriers between nations start to crumble, but only for those who can afford it. The average British working class person has in common with the average American working class person the fact that neither of them has every made a transatlantic flight; as a consequence of this, they are cultural strangers. By contrast the middle classes from both countries will be far more imbibed in the culture of the other; they will be more likely to dress the same way, speak the same way, and listen to the same music. And, as McCarthy once sang, We Are All Bourgeoisie Now. Or rather, we all think we’re bourgeoisie, as we start to achieve lifestyles which were recently only the preserve of the well off.

As globalisation increases, national identity decreases, and the British working class are left behind as the standard bearers for all things British. The other social group which retains its national identity is the ‘old rich’, the traditional ruling class who can afford to embrace other cultures but choose not to- barons, lords, minor royalty, owners of estates and country clubs. In that wonderful barometer of American society which is the Simpsons, British people are always depicted either as working class stereotypes (‘shine yer shoes, guv’nor!’) or upper class twits living in castles and drinking tea. A middle class British person would just be too similar to a middle class American to make for entertaining TV.

Blur and the Manics

The Britpop band which most clearly embraced the ideal of pro-Britishness, anti-globalisation and anti-Americanism was Blur. Nowhere is the concept more clearly represented than in the video for For Tommorow, the lead single from Modern Life Is Rubbish.

The video could almost be an advert for the city by the London Tourist Board. Damon Albarn floats in the Thames and swings from the back of a Routemaster bus. The band plays in the fountains and chase pigeons in Trafalgar Square. Jovial Londoners of all ages sing along to the chorus. Blur’s philosophy, and arguably Britpop’s philosophy, is summed up in the outro chorus, which conveys a Londoner’s feeling of bewilderment with modern life and a yearning for past certainties and a sense of British identity. You can argue, as Roobin does, that Blur were primarily about class consciousness rather than nationalism, but as I have argued above I think their fascination with working class life occurs as a secondary consequence of their fascination with British national identity.

Compare that to the Manics’ A Design For Life, the lead single from Everything Must Go, which deals directly with class conflict and working class pride.

ManicsThere are plenty of distinctly British images in the video; polo playing aristocrats are shown along side horse-mounted policemen clubbing anti-poll tax demonstrators; one of the aforementioned demonstrators clutches his bleeding head and is juxtaposed with a woman in a ridiculous hat at Ascot. But there are also American images in the video; an all-American family gaze at a Cadilac in a showroom, and kids play American football. This makes sense; if class as a concept is to mean anything then it must surely be something which is not confined by national boundaries.

Although many of the images used are associated with national identity, the song is clearly about class; in an inversion of For Tommorow, the British identity portrayed in the video is a secondary consequence of the class conflict which is at the heart of the video. Furthermore, the British identity portrayed is not a nostalgic or idealised but instead paints a picture of a society brutally divided by class conflict. Which, at the time song was released in the dying years of a long and divisive period of Conservative rule, Britain was.

If Britpop was culturally about the interplay between class and nationalism then the Manics represented the former and Blur the latter. This is why the bands are fundamentally different; this is why Nicky Wire described himself as the anti-Damon Albarn. The subject matter of A Design For Life and the nature of the music, which sounded more British than anything the Manics had previously done, meant that the band was suddenly considered a Britpop band and part of the mainstream British indie scene which they had previously despised. Radiohead’s The Bends, released a year previously with a similar sound, did not generate such interest from the music industry as the subject matter did not deal with either class or nationalism, but instead dealt with paranoia, introversion, depression and other topics usually associated with American grunge music.

Geri in union flag dressThe Demise

The demise of Britpop was ugly and messy. The obsession with class and nationalism perpetrated by the media led inevitably to the Spice Girls and Geri Halliwell’s Union flag dress, and an obsession with the fortunes of the English football team during the 1996 European Cup. The combination of class and nationalism is again represented by a national team playing a working class sport; also note the annoying tendency for the media to equate Britain with England. Some have gone as far to say that Britpop died when England lost to Germany on penalties in the semi-final; perhaps it started to die then, but it staggered on through to the election of Tony Blair on the back of a campaign combining nationalism (‘New Labour, New Britain’) with the false promise of a government which would be less hostile towards the working class. Noel Gallagher went to Downing Street for celebratory drinks.

In my view, Britpop finally died with several events which happened in quick succession towards the end of 1997. After their election in May it gradually became clear that New Labour would be just as lying and incompetent as the previous government. Oasis released their awful third album Be Here Now on 21 August. Ten days later, the Princess of Wales was killed in a car accident. The unprecedented outpouring of public grief and hostility towards the Queen and the rest of the Windsor family was the defining culmination of the class and nationalism hysteria. Nationalism, because the royal family are the symbols of the British sovereignty; class, because she was ‘The People’s Princess”, someone who had married into the Windsor family from outside. In actual fact she was just as much of a toff as the rest of them, but that did not matter to most people. She was ‘one of us’, a commoner whose life had been destroyed by the cruelty of the Royal family. London came to a standstill for her funeral. Blair milked the public’s grief with an emotional TV appearance. Elton John stayed at number one for 14 weeks with a remake of song originally written about Marilyn Monroe’s fatal drug overdose. To say it all got a bit silly would be something of an understatement.

Noel Gallagher and Tony BlairThen, Robbie Williams released Angels, and guitar music all but disappeared from the mainstream in Britain. And that was that.

I’d like to end this rather negative and cynical post on something of a positive, so here’s another great Britpop single, from before the whole thing collapsed into shit and ashes. The music is pop and the subject matter is class. Sing along now…



Roobin says:

Can I comment on yr blog yet? Uh, good stuff. I want to wrap this stuff round a better take on Beck and the X Files (and more) and channel it into HST’s theory of the Grey Decade.



Roobin says:

It works!



Roobin says:

The handle is (I think, winging it) like the approach to class by the second and third internationals. The second international approach was very much through the communist manifesto’s imputed class consciousness, consciousness as it should be. The third international approached class through race, religion, nationality and gender and so forth, starting from where class consciousness is and building from there.

We don’t want to get too Dave Spart about this but the best marriage of art and politics is on Different Class. I prefer Blur’s approach to the Manics partly through musical taste partly through a preference of narrative and reflection over agit-prop. If class consciousness is tainted and disturbed why not reflect that in your art?



Different Class is indeed a great album.

There is nothing wrong with taking a ‘third international’ approach when making class concious music. Examples of artists which do that well are Public Enemy, Bikini Kill, Bruce Springsteen… even the Manics do it to a certain extent. But I don’t think that that’s what Blur were trying to do at all. In all the interviews with Damon Albarn I’ve seen he just talks about standing up to American culture and celebrating Britishness. Like in this video for example; Brett Anderson turned down the ‘Little Englander’ role but Damon Albarn jumped at the opportunity.

I think that rejecting American culture in such a blanket way is totally wrong. I love many aspects of American culture, especially musically. Looking at my last.fm page I can see that seven out of my top ten most listened to artists are American, with only one British. Politically anti-Americanism as a philosophy is quite reactionary; for example, much of the anger over the Iraq war has been disconnected from the actual causes of the war and replaced with a vague feeling that it’s all the the fault of the Americans, thus letting the British state off the hook.

A nostalgic and romanticised view of a country inevitably leads to resentment when that ideal is shattered; hence Morrissey’s recent comments about immigration making Britain not feel like home any more. (Of course immigration is gonna make a country feel different, fucking get over it.) I tend to agree with hugely underrated eighties indie band McCarthy and the lyrics to their song Antiamericancretin, which mocks precisely that sort of sentiment.

Anyway, this wasn’t supposed to be an ‘I hate Blur’ post. I was trying to objectively look at the ideology behind Britpop, and chose Blur and the Manics to talk about as they represent opposite ends of the ideological spectrum within Britpop. I do actually quite like For Tomorrow; I don’t agree with what they’re saying in that song, but at least they’re trying to say something at all.



doly says:

genial el foro !!!

amo el brit pop

baii baii besitos



Roobin says:

“I think that rejecting American culture in such a blanket way is totally wrong. I love many aspects of American culture, especially musically.”

As do we all. We need to incorporate a functioning model of populism in the united theory of music. All mass movements build from a popular demand, usually a reaction to a social development (new or a long time brewing), usually some form of pain. Pop music, the people’s music, will reflect this. When pop musicians get political they will tend to be populist.



“When pop musicians get political they will tend to be populist.”

I remember reading about a debate the Manics had amongst themselves when they were starting out as a band. A faction fight, if you like :-p. The argument was over whether it was better to be a populist band like Guns n Roses or a pure Marxist band like McCarthy. Guns n Roses had mass appeal and a social critique of society, but their approach did not involve much in the way of detailed social theory. McCarthy had a much clear defined theoretical approach but attracted a much narrower base of support, and split up due to lack of interest rather than imploding due to the pressures of mega stardom.

The argument was resolved in favour of Guns n Roses, as the band decided that nothing but nothing was sadder than petering out due to lack of interest, even if that meant compromising on the politics. (I’m sure you can draw your own analogy with the current state of the British Left, or maybe that’s taking things too far?)

But then the populist approach of the first two Manics albums- heavy rock/metal is a very populist form of music- did not meet with the success they expected, largely because by the time they released Generation Terrorists Nirvana had released Nevermind and the rules of the game had changed considerably- now ‘alternative’ music was the new mainstream, and eighties hair metal was hopelessly out of fashion. Their approach was not fully realised until Everything Must Go, which was just as populist as their early albums but this time was far more in sync with what was popular in the country at the time. Again, this was in part due to a concious decision to emulate Oasis’ sound. Is that opportunistic, or just intelligent thinking?

So to amend your statement slightly- when successful pop musicians are political they will usually be populist. There are plenty of un-populist political musicians, but like McCarthy they usually fall through the cracks of history, because the music industry is capitalist and capitalism rewards mass appeal, not political righteousness. A certain phrase about using the tools of capitalism against itself springs to mind at this point.



Lina says:

Took a while for me to discover the British Indie rock music scene. I don’t know exactly why, must have been the American mental/class/culture blockage, all this Yank close-mindedness that one is forced to adhere to, like an automaton, like a horse with blinders on. Yet, I love this BritPop, and I buy an album when I get a chance, usuallly on payday–OASIS, Blur, The Smiths, Suede, Bloc Party, Pulp, and many more. Good sound, good beat and rhythm, guitars blazing hot; but, it’s different from American music. American rock can sometimes be really depressing. I’m American, but I prefer British rock music.



Well, I’m British, but I prefer American rock music. Like you, I had to fight against an equivalent closed-mindedness in Britain, one which said ‘thou shalt not listen to Guns n Roses’. Once you get past the cultural limitations imposed by your place of birth then the world’s your oyster. I think that applies to people from all countries.

I’m really glad you like British indie, there’s been some great music come out of that scene- you listed a load of my favourite bands there!



Leave a Reply

et cetera